i give it 4/5. thought provoking, makes people wonder what they’re doing with their lives, makes me wonder wtf i’m doing too.
review coming soon. hafta sleep now. rhibs course makes me pretty tired all the time.
14/2 update:
ok here i am on St Valentine’s Day night writing this, so you can pretty much guess my relationship status and also how well i spent my v-day. Actually i did spend it quite well. Ate with good looking friends (all male, sadly T_T), looked at good looking people walk by (omg those girls love to dress up on v-day for some reason), dreaming of one day having one of those good looking girls by my side (who has to have good character, but how could i see that while i am dreaming, right?). okok nm enough about my life since that’s obviously not what you’re reading this post for.
i must admit that i do not remember a lot of names in the French movie.
The movie is about a ‘Locked-in Syndrome’ patient called Jean-Dominique Bauby. It pretty much means that his whole body is paralysed, and that every little thing that he manages to do (eg. twitching his tongue slightly) would be deemed a “miracle” by one of his doctors, to much humour. The illness is a really rare one, such that a lot of attention is given to him — 2 female therapists are attached to him to aid his recovery, 1 female assistant to take down what he wants to say, and a few senior doctors that are tailing his case.
How does he talk? Well, one of the therapists came up with a very laborious way — to say the 26 letters of the alphabet, then wait for him to blink on one letter, and that letter would be the 1st letter of the 1st word. Now imagine writing a book like that, and you see how much time it took.
Anyway, the title made ZERO sense to me when i first thought about watching it. I was, like, wtf is a diving bell? Oh, it’s actually the thick heavy suit that divers wear to be submerged in the water. From time to time at the start, the movie portrayed Jean-Boy as a guy in a diving bell, timelessly stuck in a green murky sea, with everything around him a blur. Ben Lee says this is a big hint that the whole movie was of the *post-modernist* genre. Frankly i don’t really take notice of what to call it but i try to find ways to decipher every single scene in the movie, and how they relate to each other.
In fact, it relates almost completely inversely with the symbol of the butterfly (also in title). The pre-butterfly butterfly is a cocoon, and the cocoon, in the eyes of a literary mind, resembles the diving bell in many ways that are almost too obvious to see. A butterfly’s emergence from the cocoon is therefore a very powerful and apt symbol to illustrate the story. Jean-Dominique felt desperate and desolate after waking up from his vegetable-like coma, and one of the first sentences he made using the ’26-letter approach’ was “I want Death”. Pretty bleak, eh? But very soon later (maybe cos of time constraints of the movie!), he decided to change his perception of life and make the best of it. At the end of the day, he accepted that he could no longer walk or talk like a normal human being, but his mind was still able to function perfectly well. And so did his eyelid muscles, of course.
The word “atonement” is used a lot these days, cos of That Film With Keira Knightley In It, also named Atonement. But in this movie atonement is one thing that stood out very jarringly. How Jean-Dominique helped his father shave, when he was now like the father and the father was like the child, the cyclical nature of life and all of its little ironies. How he only wanted his son to visit him, to show him the fate of one who did not live life properly. How Jean-Dominique’s mistress Ines confronted with his “not my wife; she’s the mother of my children” over the phone right in front of him, resulting in so much unhappiness, even while he was almost completely immobile physically. Karma works, ultimately. Jean-Dominique seeked redemption by wanting his children to be like butterflies, to be more free spirited and happy with their present life, and not make his same mistakes. After all, butterflies are but fleeting insects — they die very quickly, but they live their life as beautiful, beautiful insects.
The movie is rich in imagination and symbolism that would be a treat for anyone who understands them. Many a time i was able to relate to how he was thinking and feeling, thus rendering the first-person male perspective a powerful and effective tool to engage.
The motto of the movie is “carpe diem”, urging everyone to seize the day, and not wait till you’re unable to express anything before you start regretting about stuff that you should have done before but have postponed till later.